Skip to main content
Ex-Solicitor Michael Lynn Argues Theft Conviction Should Be Overturned
English Controversial

Ex-Solicitor Michael Lynn Argues Theft Conviction Should Be Overturned

Michael Lynn argues his theft conviction should be overturned as stolen money was not property.

Summary

Disgraced former solicitor Michael Lynn is arguing that his conviction for stealing over €18 million from financial institutions should be overturned. Lynn's legal team contends that the money in question does not constitute 'property' under Irish theft laws. Lynn, who was extradited from Brazil in 2018, was jailed for obtaining multiple mortgages on the same properties without banks' knowledge. In a related incident, his associate Yavor Poptoshev was fined €500 for refusing to provide passwords for phones seized during a Garda search.

Why it's important

This legal argument challenges the definition of property in theft cases and could potentially impact the validity of Michael Lynn's conviction for a significant financial crime committed during the Celtic Tiger era. The case also highlights the legal complexities surrounding financial fraud and the subsequent retrieval and investigation processes.

Key Points

  • Michael Lynn argues theft conviction should be overturned
  • stolen money not 'property' under Irish law
  • extradited from Brazil in 2018
  • obtained multiple mortgages on same properties

Key Narratives

Based on positions and claims visible in the cited sources. Missing viewpoints are not inferred as full national or institutional perspectives.

Michael Lynn

Argues his €18 million theft conviction should be overturned because the stolen money was not property under Irish law.

Yavor Poptoshev

Refused to provide passwords for seized phones and was subsequently fined.

Involved Entities

Michael Lynn, Yavor Poptoshev

Sources (3)

Keep exploring this topic

Browse more stories in English or search Knewvia for a custom brief on any topic.